Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
85-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

85-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.029828 50.867147)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.029743 50.867138,-1.029747 50.867155,-1.029759 50.867170,-1.029777 50.867182,-1.029801 50.867190,-1.029827 50.867193,-1.029854 50.867191,-1.029878 50.867183,-1.029897 50.867171,-1.029909 50.867156,-1.029914 50.867140,-1.029910 50.867123,-1.029898 50.867108,-1.029879 50.867096,-1.029856 50.867088,-1.029829 50.867085,-1.029803 50.867087,-1.029779 50.867095,-1.029760 50.867107,-1.029748 50.867122,-1.029743 50.867138)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL